Eligibility · mode of auction and payment
Who was eligible under the terms?
The terms allowed any Indian individual over 18 and any Indian registered firm. They set no cap on the number of auctions entered or plots selected, but required a separate bid and ₹1 lakh deposit for every selected plot. KUDA listed its Estate Wing help desk number as 7382665060.
Mode of auction and payment, clause 8
What documents did the terms require for registration?
The terms required an Aadhaar card, PAN card and copy of the bidder’s bank passbook to be uploaded before registration.
BiddingPulse calculation from the published rate and plot sizes
Which figures here are BiddingPulse’s own?
The ₹15.65 lakh–₹57.12 lakh span on this page is ours, not KUDA’s: the proceedings fix ₹14,000 per square yard and print no rupee column per plot, so we multiplied that rate by each published size. At roughly two and a half times the rate KUDA set the same day for Rayachoty and Railway Kodur, Proddatur’s published rate was far higher than its neighbours. Two things to reconcile: the proceedings approve 132 plots and their table ends at row 132, while the portal publishes 133 — the extra is plot no. 55, 200 sq yd; and the proceedings’ own dates are labelled 'proposed', printing a 23 Jul–13 Aug registration window while the portal published 28 Jul–18 Aug.
Proceedings headings and the Bhoo Konugolu listing
What should I check against the source documents?
Two things to reconcile if you open the PDFs. First, the portal and the proceedings use different reference systems: Bhoo Konugolu finds this auction by listing ID 00529, while the proceedings carry 01/PDTR/KDP/PHASE-I/2026, which the portal search does not recognise. Second, the timeline shows the date printed in the proceedings heading; the PDF also carries a printed signature stamp dated later, 24 Jul 2026, and neither it nor the terms carries an embedded signature we can verify.
Proceedings plot schedule
What are the plots like?
This is the most varied plot list of the four Andhra Pradesh auctions: 68 different sizes across its rows, and only 48 plots share the common 200 sq yd size, so plot-by-plot comparison matters more here than elsewhere. Of the 133 rows the portal publishes, 62 face east and 48 west, with 16 south and 7 north; every plot fronts a 40-foot road.
Platform fee and processing fee · earnest money deposit
What deposit and fees did the terms set?
The terms set a refundable ₹1 lakh deposit for each selected plot, payable in advance through the portal to the Vice Chairperson, KUDA; three selected plots required three separate deposits. They also set a ₹500 platform fee and ₹2,000 processing fee, both non-refundable. The terms said an unsuccessful bidder’s deposit would be returned without interest within one week by the same payment method.
Mode of auction and payment, clauses 3–5
What did the terms say the deposit established?
The terms said the deposit only established eligibility. A bidder then had to place an opening bid at least ₹5,000 above the reserve price to count as active; someone who paid but never bid would not be treated as having taken part or have a claim to a plot. Bids were to move in ₹5,000 steps, and a bid in the last ten minutes extended that plot by another ten with no stated limit, so 5:00 PM was only the scheduled close.
Allotment of plot and sale agreement · payment schedule
What payments did the terms set after a successful bid?
The terms required 10% of the final price within 5 days including holidays, with the deposit counted towards it. A successful bidder was then to attend the KUDA office to conclude the sale agreement and pay the balance in three equal 30% instalments. The terms printed conflicting deadlines for the first instalment; the last two were set at 6 and 9 months from allotment. They offered a 5% rebate for full payment within a month of the agreement and added 0.5% simple interest per month for delay. Stamp duty, registration and other statutory dues were additional.
Allotment of plot and sale agreement, clause 5 · payment schedule, item 1
What first-instalment deadlines did the terms print?
The terms answer this twice, and the two answers disagree. The allotment clause says the first instalment is due within one month of allotment and links a missed deadline to forfeiture of the 10% already paid and cancellation of the allotment. The following payment schedule says the first 30% is due within 3 months. The document does not reconcile them, and BiddingPulse could not establish which provision governed.
Mode of auction and payment, clauses 6–7 · allotment terms
What did the terms say could cause forfeiture or cancellation?
The terms listed three consequences. They said withdrawing a placed bid would forfeit the deposit in full; missing the 10% payment within 5 days would forfeit the deposit and cancel the allotment; and missing the first instalment within one month of allotment would forfeit that 10% and cancel the allotment again. That one-month trigger is the deadline the two conflicting clauses above disagree about. Separately, the terms gave the Vice Chairperson discretion to accept, reject, adjourn, postpone or cancel the auction without giving a reason.